![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For those who did not realize it... my previous post was not an appeal for pedantic corrections to canonical naming conventions. It was intended to be FUNNY.
Thank you to those who did get it.
For those who are curious, my personal naming convention is probably going to be:
One
Two
Three
Four
Five
Six
Seven
Eight
The War Doctor
Nine
Shalka!Nine (darn, I forgot to include him!)
Ten
Handy
Ten-A (okay, forget this, Ten after JE is still Ten, even though he is technically Twelve)
Eleven
Twelve.
Thank you to those who did get it.
For those who are curious, my personal naming convention is probably going to be:
One
Two
Three
Four
Five
Six
Seven
Eight
The War Doctor
Nine
Shalka!Nine (darn, I forgot to include him!)
Ten
Handy
Eleven
Twelve.
no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 03:51 am (UTC)The canonicity of Shalka!Nine is problematic, to say the least. Since he was created by the BBC, he's official, but since he was not referenced in the TV series, he isn't. In the episode, he refers to events which are not consistent with TV canon as it now stands, so I think it would be rather difficult for him to be made official again rather than ignored as he is now. So I think he will remain in a sort of official/unofficial limbo. I consider him to be a sort of AU Doctor, though I suppose someone really creative could shoe-horn him in somewhere.
no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 06:07 pm (UTC)And aren't Handy and Ten-A the same thing?
no subject
Date: 2013-12-28 10:37 pm (UTC)