Not Deeply Horrible
Nov. 16th, 2012 09:36 amWell, my story for
deeply_horrible has been rejected by the vetting committee, because Snape isn't horrible in it. I'm not that surprised. I wrote to the prompt, which I think is only reasonable, and the prompt didn't lead me to write a Snape who was "nasty, cruel, unforgiving", but rather a Snape who was "desperate and full of self-loathing".
I am somewhat annoyed by the way the fest was run. They should have vetted the prompts rather than vetting the stories, and then just left us to write to the prompts, like any reasonable ficathon does. So if they run it again, I don't think I will participate.
I thought, going in, that it was simply going to be a Snape-centric ficathon which discouraged people from writing Snape as nice. Which I was quite happy with. When the prompts were going up, there were of course very dark-and-nasty prompts, but there were also prompts that were not so dark. So I was still hopeful it wouldn't necessarily be a fest consisting only of darkfic. Then came the post by the mod "clarifying" what they meant by "deeply horrible" and about what stories they would accept. This filled me with foreboding, and it seems that foreboding was justified.
Okay, I am more than somewhat annoyed. I am disappointed and angry. Please let me make it clear that this isn't sour grapes at being rejected. I perfectly agree with their assessment of my story, and had already considered it possible that they would reject it - expect to see it posted here in a day or two.
What makes me disappointed is that I probably won't be seeing the stories by other people that I was really looking forward to (judging by the prompts that were taken) because they would be rejected too.
What makes me angry is the whole concept of vetting stories, of not allowing people to write to the prompt, as their muse leads them. As I said above, if they were going to vet anything, they should have vetted the prompts, and allowed people to write as they want. To do otherwise is breaking an unwritten rule, that's what it feels like to me.
It's almost enough to make me want to run a competing ficathon. Which will be an utter failure because nobody will write for it. (sigh)
I am somewhat annoyed by the way the fest was run. They should have vetted the prompts rather than vetting the stories, and then just left us to write to the prompts, like any reasonable ficathon does. So if they run it again, I don't think I will participate.
I thought, going in, that it was simply going to be a Snape-centric ficathon which discouraged people from writing Snape as nice. Which I was quite happy with. When the prompts were going up, there were of course very dark-and-nasty prompts, but there were also prompts that were not so dark. So I was still hopeful it wouldn't necessarily be a fest consisting only of darkfic. Then came the post by the mod "clarifying" what they meant by "deeply horrible" and about what stories they would accept. This filled me with foreboding, and it seems that foreboding was justified.
Okay, I am more than somewhat annoyed. I am disappointed and angry. Please let me make it clear that this isn't sour grapes at being rejected. I perfectly agree with their assessment of my story, and had already considered it possible that they would reject it - expect to see it posted here in a day or two.
What makes me disappointed is that I probably won't be seeing the stories by other people that I was really looking forward to (judging by the prompts that were taken) because they would be rejected too.
What makes me angry is the whole concept of vetting stories, of not allowing people to write to the prompt, as their muse leads them. As I said above, if they were going to vet anything, they should have vetted the prompts, and allowed people to write as they want. To do otherwise is breaking an unwritten rule, that's what it feels like to me.
It's almost enough to make me want to run a competing ficathon. Which will be an utter failure because nobody will write for it. (sigh)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 04:23 am (UTC)But it is far too controlling, yes.
Thing is, I think she meant well. Which still doesn't make it a good move, but it does make it a little easier to forgive.
As for wank... I really hope there isn't much wank, because wank always makes things worse.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 08:54 am (UTC)Well...
Date: 2012-11-16 08:41 am (UTC)I agree with you that filtering out prompts would've been far more appropriate than rejecting stories. That's not what most folks are into fanfic for. I've also observed that broad-to-medium projects tend to do better than really narrow ones.
Re: Well...
Date: 2012-11-16 09:34 am (UTC)Well, I've asked the mods to make a post inviting people to post links to the rejected stories; I'm waiting to hear back from them.
I've also observed that broad-to-medium projects tend to do better than really narrow ones.
I think there's a balancing act to be had with organizing ficathons. A certain amount of focus-narrowing is needed so that there are enough people with something in common that they can write for each other. Even with a prompt-driven ficathon rather than an exchange-ficathon, you need people who can give prompts that the writers can write. That's why Yuletide, huge as it is, narrows down its list of qualifying fandoms.
I think it's easier to filter by subject than by tone. Filtering by fandom, by character, by theme; and then letting people do what they will.
Re: Well...
Date: 2012-11-26 05:04 am (UTC)That's often true. However, I'm loving the
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 12:04 am (UTC)(smirk)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 11:56 pm (UTC)*hugs* (I look forward to reading your story, btw.)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 12:02 am (UTC)(I look forward to reading your story, btw.)
8-)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 07:58 am (UTC)If you'd still like to share it, why not post it to the Newbie Fest as a gift? That would guarantee you a receptive audience (and guarantees us a great fic!) Just an idea...
Either way,I can't wait to read it!
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 09:07 am (UTC)I would have thought it wouldn't fit the Newbie Fest, since it's just Snape, not Snape + Hermione.
Either way,I can't wait to read it!
8-)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 04:29 pm (UTC)I wonder how many other well written stories also failed the vetting process? I'm not sure I will be participating next year, but my Muse may have other ideas, it depends on the prompts.
I'm looking forward to reading your story, wherever you post it.
Perhaps the comm ought to be called "Not Horrible enough". It would be nice if the authors of stories had somewhere to post their fics. They had spent time and effort in creating it, it would be a great pity if there was nowhere to post it, other than their own journals.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-17 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-18 10:32 am (UTC)Because I don't know who they are.
do you ever yearn for the days when there were straightforward fanzines?
Naw, not really; there's a LOT more fic to read now. True, it obeys Sturgeon's Law, but there are still strategies for finding the gems in the dross.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-21 11:21 am (UTC)I thought you might be interested to know that a response to your prompt was posted today. A very impressive sestina which I am sure you would appreciate.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-21 11:29 am (UTC)I thought you might be interested to know that a response to your prompt was posted today. A very impressive sestina which I am sure you would appreciate.
Yep, I'm subscribed to the deeply_horrible comm and have seen it. It is indeed very impressive!