Bones 3x15: The Pain in the Heart
Sep. 2nd, 2011 11:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been watching the end of Season 3 of Bones while doing crochet.
Yes, I haven't been commenting on Bones for many many episodes now, but I had to comment on this one.
One word: Whoa!
I did NOT see that coming. And yet it made sense. I take my hat off to the writers. Zack is the last person one would suspect, and yet he is also the kind of person who would be peculiarly vulnerable to skewed logic.
BRENNAN: Zack responds to logic, Booth.
BOOTH: Really? Cause I'd love to hear the logic of killing and eating people to change the world.
ZACK: The Master's logic is irrefutable.
BOOTH: Irrefutable?! I saw him choking a child at the bottom of a pool.
ZACK: If you knew what I know, you'd understand. You'd be proud of me.
BRENNAN: I've always been proud of you, Zack. I've never met anyone more rational or intelligent. But there's a fault in your logic.
ZACK: With all due respect, you aren't cognizant of his logic.
BRENNAN: Assumption #1: Secret societies exist.
ZACK: Accepted. Hodgins has been explaining this to me for years.
BRENNAN: Assumption #2: The human experience is adversely affected by secret societies.
ZACK: Accepted.
BRENNAN: Assumption #3: Attacking and killing members of secret societies will have an ameliorating effect on the human experience.
ZACK: Accepted.
BRENNAN: All of your assumptions are built upon a first principle, Zack. To wit: The historical human experience, as a whole, is more important than a single person's life.
ZACK: Yes.
BRENNAN: Yet, you risked it all so you wouldn't hurt Hodgins.
(Brennan puts her forehead against his, as a single tear rolls down his cheek.)
ZACK: There's - You are correct. There is an inconsistency in my reasoning.
BOOTH: Bones, I need a name.
BRENNAN: We know.
That scene was so perfect I immediately rewound it and watched it again.
(Transcript thanks to http://www.bonesfansonline.com/transcripts/314.htm)
This is probably the most impressive example of a major character being written out that I've seen. And yet if you told me what happened, I wouldn't have believed it.
Yes, I haven't been commenting on Bones for many many episodes now, but I had to comment on this one.
One word: Whoa!
I did NOT see that coming. And yet it made sense. I take my hat off to the writers. Zack is the last person one would suspect, and yet he is also the kind of person who would be peculiarly vulnerable to skewed logic.
BRENNAN: Zack responds to logic, Booth.
BOOTH: Really? Cause I'd love to hear the logic of killing and eating people to change the world.
ZACK: The Master's logic is irrefutable.
BOOTH: Irrefutable?! I saw him choking a child at the bottom of a pool.
ZACK: If you knew what I know, you'd understand. You'd be proud of me.
BRENNAN: I've always been proud of you, Zack. I've never met anyone more rational or intelligent. But there's a fault in your logic.
ZACK: With all due respect, you aren't cognizant of his logic.
BRENNAN: Assumption #1: Secret societies exist.
ZACK: Accepted. Hodgins has been explaining this to me for years.
BRENNAN: Assumption #2: The human experience is adversely affected by secret societies.
ZACK: Accepted.
BRENNAN: Assumption #3: Attacking and killing members of secret societies will have an ameliorating effect on the human experience.
ZACK: Accepted.
BRENNAN: All of your assumptions are built upon a first principle, Zack. To wit: The historical human experience, as a whole, is more important than a single person's life.
ZACK: Yes.
BRENNAN: Yet, you risked it all so you wouldn't hurt Hodgins.
(Brennan puts her forehead against his, as a single tear rolls down his cheek.)
ZACK: There's - You are correct. There is an inconsistency in my reasoning.
BOOTH: Bones, I need a name.
BRENNAN: We know.
That scene was so perfect I immediately rewound it and watched it again.
(Transcript thanks to http://www.bonesfansonline.com/transcripts/314.htm)
This is probably the most impressive example of a major character being written out that I've seen. And yet if you told me what happened, I wouldn't have believed it.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-03 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-03 06:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-03 08:57 am (UTC)And why would my previous statement invalid what I said anyway?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-03 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-03 04:06 am (UTC)*shivers* Well done, Bones writers.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-03 07:13 am (UTC)