Bones 2x05: The Truth in the Lye
Jun. 10th, 2009 05:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
More Bones. Looks like they're getting more creative with their titles.
Okay, this crime was rather bizarre. And grosser than usual.
The bit where Brennan pulled something out of the bath, and it was the top of his skull with hair still attached, that was gross.
A comedy of errors, in a way; I mean, it was initially manslaughter, covered up as suicide, and then covered up again with lye. And the victim was guilty of fraud, bigamy AND adultery. Oh boy.
People may see UST in Booth and Brennan, but I think, to take Booth's own words, their relationship is "too important, too much to lose".
I wasn't surprised when we got to the bookending bedroom scene and it was Cam in the bed with Booth. We knew they'd been lovers in the past (well, it was implied, anyway), so...
I wonder if Booth, were he to actually get married, would have a strong enough will to remain faithful to his wife? I mean, yes, we know he's honourable and wants to keep his promises, but we also have evidence that... it's not a temptation he finds easy to resist. Well, I guess we'll never know, because TPTB won't ever let him tie the knot with anyone.
Okay, this crime was rather bizarre. And grosser than usual.
The bit where Brennan pulled something out of the bath, and it was the top of his skull with hair still attached, that was gross.
A comedy of errors, in a way; I mean, it was initially manslaughter, covered up as suicide, and then covered up again with lye. And the victim was guilty of fraud, bigamy AND adultery. Oh boy.
People may see UST in Booth and Brennan, but I think, to take Booth's own words, their relationship is "too important, too much to lose".
I wasn't surprised when we got to the bookending bedroom scene and it was Cam in the bed with Booth. We knew they'd been lovers in the past (well, it was implied, anyway), so...
I wonder if Booth, were he to actually get married, would have a strong enough will to remain faithful to his wife? I mean, yes, we know he's honourable and wants to keep his promises, but we also have evidence that... it's not a temptation he finds easy to resist. Well, I guess we'll never know, because TPTB won't ever let him tie the knot with anyone.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:16 am (UTC)I think he would. It might occasionally not be easy, but--I do think that, to a degree, he's much more willing to be tempted without that commitment. If that makes any sense. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 08:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 09:16 am (UTC)