Good News and Bad News
Sep. 8th, 2005 07:17 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Good: Some kind anonymous person has given me extra icon space! Whee!
Bad: A pro-slasher is complaining (albeit politely) about my arguments against slash page here.
I don't know what to do. I'm not sure I can cope with the inevitable flamage if I answer her on her own LJ where she is surrounded by like-minded people who are just waiting to jump on me. Even if she herself is polite, I know that people's friends can be less than restrained when they think themselves to be jumping to the defence of a friend -- it's kind of one of the laws of friendship.
I've gotten too badly burned too many times in slash debates, I don't know if I can dare go into the fray again. Last time I swore I'd never engage in a slash debate unless I was talking to the participants face-to-face.
I'm such a coward
ETA: 7:59
My Mum has mostly convinced me I'm not being a coward, merely using common sense.
Slash is such a divisive issue that nobody walks away from such "discussions" unscathed, and nobody walks away enlightened either.
Bad: A pro-slasher is complaining (albeit politely) about my arguments against slash page here.
I don't know what to do. I'm not sure I can cope with the inevitable flamage if I answer her on her own LJ where she is surrounded by like-minded people who are just waiting to jump on me. Even if she herself is polite, I know that people's friends can be less than restrained when they think themselves to be jumping to the defence of a friend -- it's kind of one of the laws of friendship.
I've gotten too badly burned too many times in slash debates, I don't know if I can dare go into the fray again. Last time I swore I'd never engage in a slash debate unless I was talking to the participants face-to-face.
I'm such a coward
ETA: 7:59
My Mum has mostly convinced me I'm not being a coward, merely using common sense.
Slash is such a divisive issue that nobody walks away from such "discussions" unscathed, and nobody walks away enlightened either.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 10:10 pm (UTC)Also, I'm rather bemused by the fact that while she seems to be very careful not to imply that anti-slashers are bigots, most of her "re-phrasing" of your counter-arguments take it back towards the moral realm.
I myself am tempted to go challenge her statement that "ignorance isn't a right". No, maybe not; but one does have a right to at least be able to TRY to avoid things one finds offensive (hey, even the MPAA says *why* a movie is R-rated...).
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 10:41 pm (UTC)Especially the implication that I'm trying to stop people from writing slash...
I myself am tempted to go challenge her statement that "ignorance isn't a right". No, maybe not; but one does have a right to at least be able to TRY to avoid things one finds offensive (hey, even the MPAA says *why* a movie is R-rated...).
Yeah, I was thinking of movie ratings as a counter-argument myself, but I'm not sure that she'd accept a comparison of slash with porn or violence.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 12:42 am (UTC)Yeah! I'm sorry, where was that even implied? *scratches head*
Yeah, I was thinking of movie ratings as a counter-argument myself, but I'm not sure that she'd accept a comparison of slash with porn or violence.
Well...how about the MA TV rating? A show like "Rescue Me" doesn't have a lot of violence or "porn", but it gets the rating almost solely for sexual discussion (ie, what guys talk about in the locker room).
I guess her counterargument could be that non-explicit slash should then be acceptable.... *eyeroll* This is me resisting the urge to go debate....
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 10:30 pm (UTC)And I *DO* like slash, but I could never find a thing wrong with your page.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 10:36 pm (UTC)*Thank* you! That's very reassuring.
Avoid fanning the flames
Date: 2005-09-07 10:47 pm (UTC)Slash is such a divisive issue that nobody walks away from such "discussions" unscathed, and nobody walks away enlightened either.
I will agree with your Mum here. It's not being cowardly by not going there. You're simply avoiding what can do nothing other than turn into a flame war. The writer of the entry is polite and coherent. No way to say how the hard core slashers who feel insulted will respond. (That's not to say there's something wrong with hard core slashers; no more than hard core 'shippers, but when people are hard core about something, logic sometimes go straight out the window.)
Of course, like The Good 'Shipper Barges and Boats (pick any het ship in any fandom even), this is one debate that people usually feel very strongly about one way or another.
Re: Avoid fanning the flames
Date: 2005-09-07 10:58 pm (UTC)While the writer of the entry said there that she was interested in promoting discussion, I doubt that she's had enough experience with pro/anti-slash debates to know that it is practically impossible to prevent them from turning into flamewars. I mean, I've been in fandom for about 20 years, and I can think of only one occassion where such a thing hasn't gone down in flames, and that was when the discussion was happening in a face-to-face environment.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 11:28 am (UTC)FTF data helps
FTF?
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 01:54 pm (UTC)1)
2) I'm staying with
And yes, it would have been from this LJ account - the one where I can point out that not only do I write slash fanfic, I write pro gay romance.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 09:31 pm (UTC)