Communities
Active Entries
- 1: A Lack of Sound
- 2: A Lack of Email - The Next Saga
- 3: Somewhere in the 24th century...
- 4: Fluid Visions Christmas Presents!!!
- 5: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
- 6: Playlist? What Playlist?
- 7: Knit-Ho!
- 8: Dialogue that will Never Happen
- 9: The Program Formerly Known as GIMP
- 10: In What Universe Does This Make Sense?
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Style Credit
- Base style: Refried Tablet by and
- Theme: Burning Day by
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 07:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:47 am (UTC)For me, a lot of this whole argument comes down to dueling definitions and a basic, root-level disagreement about who is responsible for non-intrinsic harm resulting from the use of a resource. Is it the person who provides the resource, or the person who decides to use it? For me, it's the person who decides to use it; to say otherwise only discourages people from providing resources, and that deprives everybody.