Random Plot Bunny That I Want Someone Else To Write

[kerravonsen]

What if Dumbledore couldn't read his own handwriting? What if he had left Harry Potter at the doorstep of #11 Privet Drive instead of #4?

(yes, I've obviously been reading too many Harry Potter AUs when I should be writing my Draco story...)

Comments

[tree_and_leaf]

It's very unlikely to be rented, given that the Dursleys live next door. I'm guessing the houses were newly built when the Dursleys bought theirs, and that Mrs Figg lives in an older and less expensive part of town.

[kerravonsen]

Hmmm. Mrs Figg lived "two streets away" but we weren't told her address.
I think there's insufficient evidence for your surmises.

Mind you, it may not even matter who lives at #11 if they end up taking baby Harry to the police and Harry ends up in an orphanage and then gets adopted by someone else. A bit of plastic surgery and a new name, and nobody will know that he's Harry Potter. He'd be treated like a Muggleborn. Whether or not the staff of Hogwarts would notice his resemblance to James Potter might depend on whether they were looking for it...

Interesting thoughts, anyway.

[fred_mouse]

Given that I know nothing about the housing market in the UK, why would a house in a new suburb necessarily not be rented? Also, what is the numbering scheme that would put #11 next to #4? And are you assuming that the houses were new when the Dursley's moved there because of a detail in the book, or because it is indicative of the type of people that they are?

Sorry if this is bombarding you with questions - I wandered back to think about this, and realised there are so many things that I have no idea about.

[tree_and_leaf]

"Next door" metaphorically - in the same area.

I'm assuming it's not rented because of the type of house it is, and also because of Mr Dursely's income. The only way that kind of house would be rented would be if they were there very short term, or students - which they're not - or if it were social housing, which the Durselys wouldn't be living in. They'd think they were failures if they didn't own (apart from the mortgage, of course) their own homes.

[fred_mouse]

next door - not a usage I have seen before (neighbours yes, but next door would be literally one house either side on the same side of the road).

In terms of rentals, I was thinking of the kinds of properties that are often available for visitors (from overseas) who are there for business/academic reasons, with a family. Such a family might be there for 6 months, or maybe a year, depending on the contract that the relevant individual is on. Similarly, rentals in some suburbs are chosen by people who want to get their kids into a particular school zone (is that a relevant concept here?), and thus quite new middle class (or climbers) suburbs will have quite a few rentals. Certainly, my kids have friends whose families are renting in brand new houses in recently built suburbs. The other group that I can think of that might have a house in a new suburb are military families, although that depends on the location of the suburb.

Also - I really appreciate you taking the time to answer, it has been really helpful.