ext_50223 ([identity profile] several-bees.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kerravonsen 2004-08-01 08:01 am (UTC)

Metamagical Themas is (mostly) a collection of fairly long essays that Hofstadter originally wrote for Scientific American, and I think because of that lacks many of the characteristics I found annoying about Godel, Escher, Bach: less of the saying-the-same-thing-several-different-ways, less look-at-me-I'm-endearing stuff like the Achilles/tortoise dialogues in GEB. He deals with a lot of different subjects, so there'll probably be some sections that don't appeal (I skipped a chapter or two on Rubik's cubes, for example), but there's also almost bound to be a lot that does, and although they're all tied together to some extent (there's additional material written specifically for the book on most of the subjects covered), you don't have to read the boring sections to understand the rest. Definitely worth a look.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org