Painting A. makes me think of error propogation - A single, originating error (or in this case shift in the circle) results in more diverging error due to a calculation process (for example, a tiny error in the measurement of the velocity of a marble will largely increase when using the measurement to calculate the acceleration). Sort of like the exponential branching of fates in the butterfly effect.
Painting B. 'Cosmic Bubbles' or perhaps 'Fragile Equilibrium'. The arrangment of bubbles is reminicent of how I would imagine a telekinetic levitating objects, but I do wonder whether any telekenitic would have such fine control over objects that would normally pop to the touch! A delicate balance.
Painting E. is reminicent of a large safe door, and lock-picking: I just want all the gaps in the rings to line up! It also makes me wonder at the consecutive angles of rotation - is there a specific rule or pattern?
no subject
Sort of like the exponential branching of fates in the butterfly effect.
Painting B. 'Cosmic Bubbles' or perhaps 'Fragile Equilibrium'. The arrangment of bubbles is reminicent of how I would imagine a telekinetic levitating objects, but I do wonder whether any telekenitic would have such fine control over objects that would normally pop to the touch! A delicate balance.
Painting E. is reminicent of a large safe door, and lock-picking: I just want all the gaps in the rings to line up! It also makes me wonder at the consecutive angles of rotation - is there a specific rule or pattern?